Title: Student Reflection: Equitable Development Requires Sustained Community Engagement

There is a serious housing affordability crisis in the United States, and particularly in larger metropolitan areas like Washington, DC. In DC, like much of the rest of the country, we know this affordability crisis is most acute for the lowest income renters. These issues also disproportionately affect Black renters, due in large part to years of structural oppression in housing and lending practices. In the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak, low-income Black renters will be the hardest hit if the District or federal government does not enact a rent freeze.

My participation in the Policy Innovation Lab at McCourt has allowed me to focus on these urgent issues that affect so many of our fellow Washingtonians. In DC, concerns around rising affordability are coupled with some of the highest levels of gentrification-fueled displacement in the nation. Wards 7 and 8, east of the Anacostia River, represent the last frontiers of development in DC. As development gets underway in parts of Wards 7 and 8, many are asking who it will be for. There has been a growing push, both nationally and in DC, for planning and development to seriously engage with resident and community concerns.

This recent trend towards more equitable development has led to some promising models, but a great deal hinges on how “equity” is actually implemented in the process. Equitable development, particularly in Wards 7 and 8, is an issue situated at the intersection of people, power, and racial equity, which are all important focus areas of our work in the Policy Innovation Lab. Through my participation in programming and research with the Lab’s varying organizational partners, I’ve come to learn about some of the most important aspects of truly equitable development:

• Early and sustained engagement with residents and community members. People who live in the surrounding communities should be considered crucial partners from the beginning and throughout the process. This requires relationship-building and commitments that rely on hard-earned trust.
• Defined targets and accountability. Poorly defined and ambiguous goals leave room for declaring victory without tangible results. These targets should be realistic for the situation, but specific enough to provide clarity around the successes and areas for improvement.
• Legitimate power for residents and communities. It is not enough to provide a seat at the table; that seat must come with some legitimate say in decisions, unlike DC’s federal representation. This power should ideally be democratically distributed, rather than privilege a few connected residents.

In the Lab, we’ve had the opportunity to learn from the team working on the 11th Street Bridge Park, which has been widely cited for their approach to equitable development. Their success thus far has been due in large part to the way they’ve seriously committed to early and sustained community engagement and planning, accountability, and evaluation of implementation targets.