Common-Sense Evidence: The Education Leader’s Guide to Using Data and Research
Gordon, Nora & Conaway, Carrie. (2020). “Common-Sense Evidence: The Education Leader’s Guide to Using Data and Research.” Harvard Education Press.
Postsecondary Data Infrastructure: What is Possible Today
O’Hara, Amy. (2019). “Postsecondary Data Infrastructure: What is Possible Today.” The Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP).
Reconciling After Civil Conflict Increases Social Capital but Decreases Individual Well-being
Cilliers, Jacobus., Dube, Oeindrila., & Siddiqi, Bilal. (2016). “Reconciling after civil conflict increases social capital but decreases individual well-being.” Science, Volume 352 (6287), pp. 787-794.
Big Data and the Transformation of Public Policy Analysis
Jarmin, R.S. and O’Hara, A.B. (2016). “Big Data and the Transformation of Public Policy Analysis.” J. Pol. Anal. Manage., 35: 715-721.
A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development
K. Chretien, M. Tuck, M. Simon, L. Singh, T. Kind. (2015). “A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development.” Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Query Operator for Comparing Uncertain Graphs
D. Dimitrov, L. Singh, L. and J. Mann. (2015). “Query Operator for Comparing Uncertain Graphs.” Transactions on Large-Scale Data and Knowledge-Centered Systems, 8980: 115-152. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
The Consequences of Broader Media Choice: Evidence from the Expansion of Fox News
Hopkins, Daniel. & Ladd, Jonathan. (2014). “The Consequences of Broader Media Choice: Evidence from the Expansion of Fox News.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Volume 9, pp. 115–135.
Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters
Ladd, Jonathan. (2011). “Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters.”
Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court
Bailey, Michael. & Maltzman, Forrest. (2008). “Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review, Volume 102(3), pp. 369-384.